Hi Mike,
This is embarrassing. I must have dozed off when the @ symbol came into common use. I keep seeing references to @argc, @argv, @name, etc. scattered throughout the wrapper code comments. I'm having no luck with a Google search.
So, my question is: What does the @ symbol mean when used this way?
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:31:47 GMT, Ron Tarrant wrote:
So, my question is: What does the @ symbol mean when used this way?
It's got something to do with documentation?
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:56:48 GMT, Ron Tarrant wrote:
It's got something to do with documentation?
Okay, I think I've got it now. The '@,' along with other symbols such as '%' and '#' are directives used by GtkDoc to generate documentation from code file comments.
Please correct me if I'm going off in the wrong direction here.
On 11-04-2020 11:35, Ron Tarrant wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 08:56:48 GMT, Ron Tarrant wrote:
It's got something to do with documentation?
Okay, I think I've got it now. The '@,' along with other symbols such as '%' and '#' are directives used by GtkDoc to generate documentation from code file comments.
Please correct me if I'm going off in the wrong direction here.
Yes they are from the C documentation / Gtk-Doc, @ denotes parameters
and % i believe denotes types like TRUE, FALSE, and NULL.
adrdox understands most of these so they shouldn't show up in the online
documentation.
On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 12:37:52 +0200, Mike Wey wrote:
Yes they are from the C documentation / Gtk-Doc, @ denotes parameters
and % i believe denotes types like TRUE, FALSE, and NULL.adrdox understands most of these so they shouldn't show up in the online
documentation.
Thanks, Mike.
